Regional Trade Agreements and the Neo-Colonialism of the United States of America and the European Union: A Review of the Principle of Competitive Imperialism

The recent proliferation of Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs) in the last two decades raises questions about the paradigm shift from the multilateral trading system of the World Trade Organization (WTO) to bilateral and regional preferential trade arrangements. Even more questionable is the fact that the United States of America (USA) and the European Union (EU), among the other trading powers of the world, are leading the use of RTAs to the detriment and neglect of non-discriminatory trade liberalisation. It has been suggested that neo-colonialism may be the motivation for the use of RTAs by the USA and the EU as their international trade policy of choice within a broader competitive process for imperial domination of their preferential trading partners. This article reviews this suggestion in order to propose an alternative explanation for the RTA practice of the USA and the EU.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Similar content being viewed by others

Paradigm Shift of the EU’s Preference of Trade Relations: The Case of the EU-South Korea FTA

Regional Trade in South Asia: An International Legal Analysis

Comprehensive Trade Agreements: Conditioning Globalisation or Eroding the European Model?

Notes

For another use of the term ‘competitive imperialism’, see Schoonover, T.D. 1998. Germany in central America: Competitive imperialism, 1821—1929. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

References

• Abbott, F.M. 2007. A new dominant trade species emerges: Is bilateralism a threat? Journal of International Economic Law 10(3): 571–583. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Bauer, P.T. 1981. Equality, the third World and economic delusion. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
• Bhala, R. 2008. International trade law: Interdisciplinary theory and practice. 3rd ed. New York: Lexis Nexis. Google Scholar
• Bhala, R. 2000. The bananas war. McGeorge Law Review 31(4): 839–971. Google Scholar
• Bhala, R. 2007. Competitive liberalization, competitive imperialism, and intellectual property. Liverpool Law Review 28(1): 77–105. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Davey, W.J. 2006. The WTO: Looking forwards. Journal of International Economic Law 9(1): 3–29. Google Scholar
• Dukgeun, A. 2008. Foe or friend of GATT article XXIV: Diversity in trade remedy rules. Journal of International Economic Law 11(1): 107–133. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Finger, M.J. 2007. Trade negotiations and developing countries negotiating trade: Developing countries in the WTO and NAFTA. World Trade Review 6(1): 135–148. Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, E. 1997. Development as colonialism. The Ecologist 27(2): 69–76. Google Scholar
• Krisch, N. 2005. International law in times of hegemony: Unequal power and the shaping of the international legal order. European Journal of International Law 16(3): 369–408. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Limão, N. 2006. Preferential versus multilateral trade liberalization: Evidence and open questions. World Trade Review 5(2): 155–176. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Marushkin, B. 1975. The American tradition: What remains? From war for independence to neo-colonialism. Moscow: Novosti Press Agency Publishing House. Google Scholar
• Regional Trade Agreements Section, World Trade Organization. 2011. Regional trade agreements. Regional trade agreements gateway. http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/region_e/region_e.htm. Accessed 1 December 2011.
• Schoonover, T.D. 1998. Germany in central America: Competitive imperialism, 1821–1929. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
• van Aaken, A, and J. Kurtz. 2009. Prudence or discrimination? Emergency measures, the global financial crisis and international economic law. Journal of International Economic Law 12(4): 859–894. Google Scholar
• Whitt, J.A. 1996. The mexican peso crisis. Economic Review 81(1): 1–20. Google Scholar

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

1. Faculty of Law, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong Gonzalo Villalta Puig
2. The Liverpool Law School, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK Omiunu Ohiocheoya

1. Gonzalo Villalta Puig